This is an outdated version published on 2024-03-19. Read the most recent version.

The Efficiency of Online Assignments as an Asynchronous e-Learning Tool

Authors

  • Imane FERSAOUI Ecole Normale Supérieure, Bouzareah, Algiers, Algeria Laboratory of Teaching, Training, and Didactics
  • Neema GHENIM University of Mohamed Ben Ahmed, Oran 2, Algeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70204/jlt.v2i2.249

Keywords:

Asynchronous learning, efficiency-e-learning tools, online assignment, synchronous instruction

Abstract

The online learning experience that accompanied the Covid-19 pandemic has been diverse. Both
teachers and students have had to discover new online learning methods and tools in order to cope
with the new phase. Some teachers relied on virtual meetings and synchronous instruction, whereas
others either solely relied on asynchronous instruction through e-assignments or combined the
latter to other methods like synchronous e-meetings. While the integration of synchronous tools in
distance instruction seems to be more relevant, asynchronous assignments may have an important
potential in e-learning given that not all students can access the course at the same time. Indeed,
one of the advantages of asynchronous e-assignments is learning anytime, anywhere. For this, the
in-hand paper seeks to focus on online assignments and their efficiency to university EFL students.
Our purpose is to discover how students view these assignments, and whether they are efficient in
learning according to them. We also wish to investigate whether students prefer synchronous
online meetings or asynchronous learning tools like e-assignments. In this regard, the sample is
made up of fifth-year EFL students at ENSB. By and large, the main findings of this study
demonstrate that the majority of EFL students consider asynchronous e-assignments as an efficient
e-learning tool.

Published

2024-03-19

Versions

How to Cite

FERSAOUI, I. ., & GHENIM, N. . (2024). The Efficiency of Online Assignments as an Asynchronous e-Learning Tool. Journal of Languages and Translation, 2(2), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.70204/jlt.v2i2.249

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.